|
Here we have the age old conundrum, of a simple idea getting complicated by race teams, who, by careful reading of the rulebook, try to get an advantage over their opponents. This will always happen, by the very nature of what we are doing.
As has already started, some class 3 teams have turned to using expensive cbr125 watercooled motors, which as standard, put out more far more BHP than the cg125, and I would guess the same amount as a tuned OHC XL/XR honda. Fair enough, but with money thrown at them 17BHP is achievable. Not fair. Our healthy £100 cg motor is effectively scrap. They have now got class1 grade motors allowed in class 3. This needs to be considered by the rule makers. Next year, with a baby on the way, and no team mates, I cannot afford to build a tuned cbr motor, a situation I'm sure is familiar to many. As for tuned pitbike engines, since when have they ever been in a manufactured road homologated machine, apart from the madass?
If a class 3 arms race is to be avoided, sort the bikes into "classic/ air cooled" and watercooled / modified. Put the pitbike engined & watercooled 4 strokes together with the honda RS' . The rs50's and GPR's running the original frames seem to be evenly matched against the cg/xl aircoled club, so stick them in together. 50cc 2 stroke aircooled in any chassis, should be upto playing with us. (honda rs with aircooled 50cc motor??, there's an idea)
I'm sure there are gaps and flaws in my suggestions, but Rodger would be wise to consider the murmours from the middle of the pack, even though we don't make as much noise as the class leaders, to ensure a healthy future for our race series. This needs to be done ASAP, as teams are already looking towards next year.
Lastly, May I thank Rodger/Fab racing for the efforts he has put in to keep our series going. It may not be exactly what we each want, but it beats the hell out of not racing at all.
|